This consultation started on 12th December 2007 and ended on 15th February 2008.
it's Monday morning, but sometimes I think we're not making any progress at all. Are lawyers at the root of this problem? I was at a discussion about privacy recently. The group were discussing a response to the Ministry of Justice Thomas/ Walport data sharing review consultation. Pete Bramhall from HP sagely noted that the consultation document began with the statement that it assumed a familiarity with the Data Protection Act and other relevant legislation. How come, he pointed out, it did not assume a familiarity with
consultation paper on the use and sharing of personal information in the public and private sectors
consultation paper on the use and sharing of personal information in the public and private sectors
Commissioner Richard Thomas is one of the two men in charge of the consultation, which will focus on the use and sharing of information. The other is Government science and technology advisor Dr Mark Walport. Source - Out-Law.com Related - The consultation paper Reddit It | Digg This | Add to del.icio.us
Information Commissioner Richard Thomas is one of the two men in charge of the consultation, which will focus on the use and sharing of information. The other is Government science and technology advisor Dr Mark Walport. Source - Out-Law.com Related - The consultation paper Reddit It | Digg This | Add to del.icio.us
Richard Thomas and Dr Mark Walport are conducting a consultation on the use and sharing of personal information in the public and private sectors as part of their independent Data Sharing Review.? Full story Ministry of Justice, 12th December 2007 Source: www.justice.gov.uk
List powered by Technorati